Not much new to add to my analysis, but between the post, eWeek and the New York Times, I’d say awareness has increased in the last two weeks dramatically.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/29/AR2011012903731.html
Not much new to add to my analysis, but between the post, eWeek and the New York Times, I’d say awareness has increased in the last two weeks dramatically.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/29/AR2011012903731.html
Google publicly announces another step towards ridding the ‘net of content farms:
http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=145070#
Andrew Follett makes a good point in his recent article regarding website redesign:
I’m sick of looking at the same website every day!
Using the same website day after day can get tiresome, but keep in mind that many, if not most, of your visitors don’t see your site every day. So although it may seem to you that it’s time for a change, your visitors are likely just starting to get used to your website.
You can read the full article here:
As more and more search engines enter the content creation world, will the boundaries of editorial integrity be crossed?
If Google starts acquiring blogs to sell ads on those blogs, wouldn’t they be more inclined to ensure those blogs spoke positively of Google and negatively of its competitors? Okay, perhaps not entirely conspicuously – but if you network of content creation is large enough, maybe it doesn’t matter. Google just wants to make money, and that requires articles people read (a.k.a ad inventory). Sometimes negative articles make you more transparent and create plenty of ad inventory.
Further analysis here: http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=144500&nid=123530#
MarketingProfs gives us this article on lead generation tips for B2B folks (though I have found that leadgen tips often span both B2B and B2C).
http://www.mpdailyfix.com/5-things-you-need-to-know-to-boost-your-lead-generation/
Here’s the deal. I’m running a multi-million dollar search campaign for a client and we’re obviously very focused on campaign copy, audience targeting and creative. However, in campaigns of this size, even the slightest percentage increase can yield huge ROI gains. So, focusing on your landing page and conversion funnel is extremely important. Gains in your funnel can dramatically improve your ROI. I recently change the form and registration step on a landing page and saw a gain in click-to-conversion of 400% for the campaign. Caution: results aren’t typical. We were looking for a 10-25% increase. Who knew. But now we’re not stopping there. We’re doing further split testing to see what the right combination of fields and steps are.
Then, we’re moving down the funnel and looking at our marketing automation. We’re analyzing what messages are sent to new leads and when, and at what interval. We’re working with our sales team to understand what else we can do to deliver leads. So, as you can see, you cannot focus on just one area. There are gains to be had everywhere.
Problogger recently posted a great “200-level” article on their site with regards to driving traffic. Obviously 100-level stuff consists of the basics we all know (like posting quality content with good, catchy titles). This 200-level article discuss some lesser known tips, which I highly recommend.
My bonus tip is to repost content you find interesting, and add your own commentary. Essentially, that’s what I’m doing right now. By doing this you achieve a couple things:
http://www.problogger.net/archives/2011/02/05/10-little-known-ways-to-get-traffic-to-your-blog/
AOL just convinced itself to pay $315 for the HuffPost, which produces limited original content, outside of the ranting deranged posts of its readers who comment on the articles HuffPost assembles and reposts from other sites and sources.
Content farms are a true travesty on the internet, hurting high quality content providers and the end user.
The New York Times just penned a great article on this: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/11/business/media/11search.html?hpw.
The bottom line though is it will be tough for Google to crack down on these abusers who provide low value content. They do a great job at capturing traffic, which ultimately brings in traffic that in turn clicks on Google ads… So Google is making a ton of money off of these farms and therefore, it it lowered the rankings of the sites, it could lose money. The hope is that this will not happen because the better sites will get clicked, and generate revenue for Google; and more people will have a better experience, leading to more clicks. Recent data suggests that Google is losing this battle versus Bing. Bing is getting more people to click on a result than Google. I wouldn’t be surprised if Google updates its algorithm to slowly lower the rankings of sites that produce mostly crap content.